The Threshold Assessment Method

A controlled path from declared position to leadership-owned governance.

The Method establishes the institution's current position from evidence, keeps regulatory findings separate from governance maturity, and carries the matters that require institutional judgement into Decide.

Five stages

Establish. Discover. Test. Validate. Decide.

01

Establish

Confirm the perimeter, jurisdictions, representation and evidence rules.

02

Discover

Identify AI systems, where they are used and the regulatory context that applies or may apply.

03

Test

Test the declared baseline against the evidence the institution can produce.

04

Validate

Validate facts, evidence coverage and accountability. Record disputes and matters that remain unresolved.

05

Decide

Bring the evidence-supported position and material matters to leadership for decision.

Evidence model

The position is not the declaration.

The Assessment begins with the position the institution believes it holds. Evidence is then sighted and assessed against 62 indicators across six governance Dimensions.

The evidence-supported position may be lower than, equal to, or higher than the declared baseline. Each Dimension retains its own position. The six Dimensions are not averaged into one institutional maturity score.

Evidence establishes the current position. Leadership establishes the owned position.

Six governance Dimensions

One institutional view, without collapsing the differences.

D1

AI Governance & Accountability

D2

Data Readiness & Privacy

D3

AI Strategy & Use Case Management

D4

Workforce Readiness & Safe Use

D5

Vendor & Procurement Governance

D6

Incident Response & Risk Management

Regulatory treatment

Maturity is not compliance.

Threshold maintains a controlled regulatory register across the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman and Bahrain. Binding provisions in scope, provenance, applicability and the evidence outcome are recorded separately from the governance position.

Selected international frameworks can be used as guidance or benchmarks. They are not presented as local law, and framework alignment is not treated as a compliance determination.

Where legal interpretation is required, the question remains with the institution and its legal counsel.

After the Assessment

The Findings Record is not the end of the work.

The Assessment produces the evidence-supported Findings Record. Matters that require institutional choice, ownership or direction move into Decide.

Once leadership has established the position it intends to own, Threshold can draft the AI Use Policy, Accountability Map and Governance Brief that record those decisions.

Discuss the Assessment →

Assessment, not certification, assurance, legal advice or a compliance determination. The Method does not perform technical model-performance testing or operating-effectiveness testing.